Standing Up for Workers, Taxpayers and Local Communities
Concerns About Mandated Collective Bargaining Under SB378
Sign The Letter
Why is this important?
- Erodes local control: SB378 shifts key decisions away from local governments and communities, replacing local judgment with state-driven mandates.
- Reduces flexibility for workers and employers: Mandatory collective bargaining locks both sides into rigid systems that make it harder to adapt to changing needs, budgets, or economic conditions.
- Increases long-term taxpayer costs: Binding agreements can commit local governments to compensation and benefit structures that are difficult to reform, even during fiscal downturns.
- Creates one-size-fits-all mandates: Public agencies vary widely, but SB378 imposes uniform rules that don’t reflect local realities or workforce needs.
- Limits accountability to the public: Negotiations conducted through institutional bargaining can prioritize special interests over transparency and responsiveness to taxpayers.
- Unnecessary given existing protections: Public employees already have avenues to raise concerns and advocate for fair treatment without mandatory collective bargaining.
- Risks reduced service quality: Rigid work rules can hinder innovation and efficiency, making it harder for governments to deliver high-quality public services.